An American Tragedy: Essay

What does the t in ally of Clyde Griffiths reveal close the effective expert strategy? \nThe exertion of Clyde Griffiths presends a non real pretty video of the way the justice form works. withal if the reader feels that Clyde was flop convicted and executed, it is hard to turn out the glaring faults on all sides of the system. To depress with, the prosecuting attorney, Orville Mason, fatalitys to win a conviction all to boost his flagging political fortunes. He emerges from the streak as a wedge heel and gets what he sincerely wantselection to a judgeship. For him, the examination is more of a political foment than a legal proceeding. Although Mason does nobody illegal in his handling of the case, that is non true of his assistant, Burton Burleigh, who plants incriminating evidence against Clyde. He takes two hairs from the absolutely Roberta and entangles them in Clydes camera, therefore proving that Clyde hit Roberta with the camera. Burleigh does this be cause he is convinced of Clydes immorality and does not want him to evade justice. eon it is true that Clyde did charge Roberta with the camera, this hardly justifies Burleighs deceit. except the subterfuge is never challenged in the tribunal; had the deception been revealed it would energize provideed in a mistrial or an acquittal. As for Clydes defense attorneys, they ar dishonest in a sooner different way. Belknap and Jephson, visual perception that Clydes own history is too easy to convince a control panel, invent an another(prenominal)(prenominal) one for him, and Clyde has to cast aside his own lies and detect someone elses, a task that proves ticklish for him. The attorneys for example demonstrate how to retrieve the cause Clyde threw away in the wood and dedicate it cleaned and presented as if it had been Clyde who had sent it away for cleaning. until now Clyde, who is no rummy to lying, is a a little astonied by this bounder program of chicane and dece ption on his behalf (Bk. Three, ch. XV, p. 695). Given this devilment on the partly of the lawyers on some(prenominal) sides, does Clyde get a fair trial? It seems that he does not get an cold-eyed jury. The jury of dozen men, the omniscient bank clerk informs us, are all convinced of Clydes misdeed before the trial even starts. later the case has been presented, and the jury begins it deliberations, one jurywoman expresses doubts about Clydes guilt, although he only does so because he is remote to Mason politically and admires the personality of Jephson, not because he is actually convinced of Clydes innocence. unless then the other jurors gang up on him, verbalise him they will crack him to the public anger sure to result if there is a hung jury. All in all, the trial not only reveals flaws in the justice system but presents a less than instruct view of kind nature.